History
Repeats Itself: From 1844-1845's Berlin Conference to the 2011's Invasion
of Libya
By
Dr. Bienvenu-Magloire Quenum
The
image at the left of this paragraph (courtesy of Wikipedia) tells all. Western
nations, one hundred and sixty six years after the unfamous
1844-1845's Berlin Conference, are back on African soil - under Nato's flag.
Indeed, for seven months running, since March 21, 2011,
at the date of current delivery, Libya's territory had been submitted
to daily heavy bombardments, carried out by NATO's war planes
to assist the rebels from Cyrenaica/Benghazi
region fulfill their quest for Democracy against the alleged "dictatorship" rule
of Colonel Gaddafi.
The delivery available
at this link demonstrates the humanitarian reasons put forward
by Nato's nations are just a veil for regime change in Tripoli.
All sort of means had been used by Nato's nations to demise Gaddafi's regime-
from telecommunication jamming, flooding of cell phones with sms, to
brodcasting false information; bombings of state owned television buildings,
destruction of water and energy systems, deployment of British, French, American
and Italian Special Forces on ground [a, b]
- acting as special advisers to the rebels but taking also part in the operation,
spearheads to seize towns; bombings of rallies favorable to the Gaddafi
regime. Etc.
The diffusion of false news (the announcement of the capture of Saif-Al-Islam
the son of Gadaffi by the NTC on August 21, 2011 , who appeared 24 hours latter
to denounce the manipulation). The repetitive death announcement of another son
of Gaddafi, head of Libyan special forces. Etc.
And foremost, the formidable propaganda machine of western media, of all walks
of the political scenery from the right wing to the farmost left wing, delivering
Nato's communications and press conferences without any critical analysis. You
read one of these newspapers and magazines, you do not need to read the others!
Watch the two following videos. The one exposed at the left shows rally of Gaddafi
supporters at the Green Place. The other one, at the right side, shows alleged
Libyans celebrating the downfall of Gaddafi at the Martyrs's Square (the new
name of the Green Place).
Watch carefully.
Compare the video at the left, shot at Tripoli, at the "true" Green
place, with the one supposedely shot at Tripoli exposed at the right side. What
do you see? Do you remark the height of the palm threes in the background of
the video at the left? Yes you do.
Do you see any construction crane hanging in the air
in the background of the video at the left? Palm trees of the same size as on
the video on the left side in the video at the right side? No. You didn't. Because
the video at the right had been shot on a decorum landscape setup by the invaders
in a Arabian Gulf state, to make believe that the scene was shot at Tripoli.
In the hastiness to deceive and broadcast false information, the deceivers
who cook the video at the right side left some clues evidence for a sober observer
to spot the deception.
Listen
to Dr. Webster Tarpley's video below outlined at the left side, who has more
on the matter. Look carefully at the image at the right side, supposedely
shot at the Green Place at Tripoli. Look at the bottom lower right side.
See the yellow colored wall that has no fresques as exposed by Dr. Tarpley.
Have you noticed also the cranes in the background of the image?
Above
videos, image, and discussion are proofs that the Gaddafi's regime's sudden
collapse was astutely masterminded by Nato's and western countries political
strategists and media propaganda specialists,
in addition to the heavy bombings. The rebels are just faire-valoir, who
do not represent 10 percent of Libyan population.
-
What For?
At
first glance, oil is the answer. Nato's nations want to control Libya's oil
fields, oil production and distribution - at pricing that suits them. However,
as exposed in other deliveries available at these outlined links [1, 2],
there is more to it than capturing oil fields:
"Simply put, Nato's member nations are trying to steer back
Libya Central Bank into the mainstream financial structure, under the watching
eyes of the World Bank and the International Monetary Funds, to provide (reconstruction)
funds to Libya with hefty interests payments - and transform a country which
was free of debts (for four decades running) into a heavily indebted country
- as done everywhere else in sub-Saharan African countries."
Which bring us back to 1844-1845's Berlin Conference.
-
1844-1845's Berlin Conference and the Scramble for African Natural Resources
and Territories
Since
March 2011, we are witnessing a repeat of history. The countries that
colonized Africa to plunder it and impede its economic emergence are
the same Nato's member states which are supporting the National Transition
Council (NTC) of Libya. In the nineteen century, they used their monopoly
in firearm to conquest Africa and now they are using their advance in
Information Technology to do the same. Nothing new under the sun!
Indeed, as
brilliantly demonstrated
by Walter Rodney, Africa had been, and still
is economically exploited to remain a subsidiary client to the economic
powers of the day. Everything is done, through astutely implemented
economic, political and financial policies, to keep the continent
as a consumer of imported expensive goods, and remaining provider
of cheap soft commodities and mineral raw materials. Resorting to
military might if necessary - as one can see with the Libyan crisis.
To make the story brief and summing up, let us say that, starting from
the fifteenth century, Europe used maritime experience combined with
firearm supremacy to carry out the systematic economic conquest of
sub-Saharan African region.
Following the
arrival of Portuguese ships on West African shores in 1444, the Europeans
set up a triangular trading system - Europe, Africa, Americas. They
took control of the export of enslaved human beings to the Americas,
the exploitation of tropical wood species and the “purchase” of
ivory and gold, shipped to Europe and Americas. All exchanged for overpriced
bottles of alcohol, Asian small glass beads, and European-made trinkets
and baubles given to African rulers.
When the immorality of the human trading/ slavery become obvious, starting
from the beginning of the nineteen century, the
European elites, who always plan in advance, seeing the forthcoming abolition
of human trading, started brainstorming for
an alternative to cheap labor and or cheap natural resources. That
is the main reason to convene 1844-5 Berlin Conference that planned
for the partition of Africa amongst the European powers of the day:
Portugal, France, the United Kingdom and Germany.
Indeed, Berlin's Conference was followed by a systematic conquest of
African territories symbolized by the "astounding" picture at the begining
of this delivery. European nations established a complete political
and economic domination of Europe over Africa, further altering Africans’ socio-cultural
value systems and fabrics; and diverting the development process from
its initial endogenous path to an “externally driven process,” manipulated
and managed by the Europeans.
After some forty years of colonial rule, around 1925, the five-centuries-old
inter-African trade established by generations of Africans was
completely annihilated, and replaced by another trading system, North-South
oriented. That international trading flux was established and reinforced
between each colony and its European master, with underpriced bulk raw materials
(minerals and cash crops) shipped to the North and overpriced manufactured
products to the South.
The unequal trade imposed from the mid-fifteenth century on Africa contributed greatly to the progressive accumulation of capital in Europe, and assisted Europe in the mid-seventeenth century carrying out and financing the industrial revolution, which put Europe’s global economy on a sustained growth path that accelerated the development process. Thus, Europeans moved increasingly toward more development and better living conditions.
By contrast, during the pre-colonial period, from the mid-fifteenth century to the end of the nineteenth century, Africa was “cornered” into selling human beings (shipped as slaves to European cotton and sugarcane plantations and estates in the Americas) in exchange for worthless goods, as earlier stated.
Further, during the colonial period, from the last years of nineteenth century up to the 1960s, Africa was the supplier to Europe of underpriced raw materials (mineral and agricultural commodities) and buyer of overpriced manufactured products.
For one to apprehend the consequences of the unequal trade established by Europe with Africa, it is essential to quote Walter Rodney:
“Colonial
Africa fell within that part of the international capitalist economy
from which surplus was drawn to feed the metropolitan sector. As seen
earlier, exploitation of land and labour is essential for human social
advance, but only on the assumption that the product is made available
within the area where the exploitation takes place. Colonialism was not
merely a system of exploitation, but one whose essential purpose was
to repatriate the profits to the so-called mother country. From an African
viewpoint, that amounted to consistent expatriation of surplus produced
by African labour out of African resources. It meant the development
of Europe as part of the same dialectical process in which Africa was
underdeveloped.” [p.149]
In other words, the domination of Europe over Africa, from the mid-fifteenth century onwards, hindered sub-Saharan African countries, for five centuries, from accumulating capital in spite of shipping huge quantities of commodities to Europe. In the meantime, for five centuries, Europe made good use of the encounter with Africa. She accumulated capital gained from her overseas colonised territories (with a huge contribution from Africa), shrewdly invested the surplus in productive economy, industrialized the economy, steadfastly moving toward more development; increasing national wealth and riches for all.
At the same time, Africa, heavily depopulated by the slaves’ trade that shipped
its youth to America; deprived (by Europe) of political and economic decision-making
power, and lacking sustained investment funds, trod the reverse path, sinking
deeper and deeper into non-development and poverty.
Walter Rodney’s book features hundreds of documented examples that expose the many aspects of the deception put in place to transfer to Europe economic surplus generated by Africa’s
labour and resources.
The political independence Europe “granted” to overseas
territories in sub-Saharan Africa during the 1960s changed nothing about
the above trend. On the contrary, Europe’s economic domination over sub-Saharan
Africa deepened. And now, at the beginning of the 21st century, the situation
is worsening and may become a complete disaster in the near future of 20 years
ahead if African policymakers do not react quickly to defend the continent
against predatory trading practices exercised by the developed countries.
-
Gaddafi Assisted Libya to Escape the Clutches of Neo-Liberalism and Globalization
Indeed, a new global domination structure is in place since mid-1980s, labelled
with the vague and misleading term “globalization,” which is perpetuating Africa’s economic dependence and further impoverishing at high-speed African nations, forced under Structural Adjustment Programs to sell state-run companies (mines, utilities and energy production) to developed countries’ big corporations.
One country escaped the fate of sub-Saharan African countries: Libya, under
the leadership of Muammar Gaddafi. Gaddafi set up an independent Central
Bank, and managed to get 90 percent of oil revenues for Libya state - leaving
the exploiting companies (mostly from western Europe) with 10 percent.
With the construction of the Great Man Made River he shows how to use an
independent Central Bank to finance national development. He, therefore,
become an example to eradicate. (Click here for more reading, Tribute
to Gaddafi in Spite of Everything Else.)
Yes, there
is a state of urgency, since the beginning of the new millennium, as investors
from the developed world now buy arable land in African countries to establish
agribusiness for the export market and particularly for bio-fuels’ production.
That is a great danger for the future of African nations, which, in order
to reversing the decline of the
economy, need to develop food-crops agriculture
for food security purpose, process these into value added produce and develop
trading among African nations.
-
Could the Offensive of the European Elites to Reconquer Africa Succeed?
The
battle for Tripoli does not concern Libya only. It is a battle for
the Black continent economic (and political) future. The (African) newspapers
and magazines which consider the fall of Gaddafi as the liberation of
Africa are either underestimating the onslaught of Nato's nations or
are simply blind, and let say it - accomplices.
How can one consider that the fall of Gaddafi liberates Africa? So,
Africa was under the supervision of Gaddafi? He, Gaddafi, had never
have it easy - over years - in debates and discussions during the African
Union's meetings to impose his political views and vision for the black
continent. In spite of all his readily available financial means, he
was constantly challenged by a score of African head of states.
He, Gaddafi, had never
been a dominating figure amongst the circle of African Union's head
of states. So, what liberation these magazines and newspapers are talking
about? [And oddly enough, the same African head of states who firmly
challenged him over years, are now the ones who are helping him overcome
Nato's onslaught. They know that the economic (and political) future
of the continent is at stake.]
Thus, one can here declare that the fall of Gaddafi is
a blow to the economic development of the continent. It is, simply put, another
step taken by the powers of the day, first to erase an independent
economic development process, and second, tighten the economic (starvation)
belt around sub-Saharan African countries.
Had anyone of said Nato's countries,
the same who met one hundred and sixty six years ago in Berlin (to
divide and conquer Africa) done anything to develop the continent as
Gaddafi did as
here exposed, to strenghen the economic development and financial independence
of the Black Continent? None of them. As described brillantly by Walter
Rodney in the above quotation from his must have book, How
Europe Underdeveloped Africa, they come and plunder, destroy and destructure.
Anyway,
whatever is written here and there about the temporary defeat of
Libya nationalists, does not matter. The future would tell if that
defeat is final. It all depends on the fight put on by the majority
of the Libyan people, and, based on the fierce resistance
the nationalists are showing on the ground, one can say they lost one
battle but the hope for victory is on their side. They have the privilege
to wage an asymetric war against the invaders. That is mainly to impede
by all means and manners the resumption of oil exploitation.
From a transitory council, the
rebels are now speaking of provisory government (October 7, 2011),
to save face, and try to hide the embarrassment of infighting. Truly,
the infight between the several wings of the rebels, to reaching a
final representative government is so fierce that
one can say, doubtless, that it is mission impossible. It
will not work!
The NTC's attempts to bribe
Libyan tribes to subversion also failed. The tribes's elders know what
is ahead if they fall into the trap.
Further, dissensions between the
invaders are also mounting. The westerners pointing
fingers to the Arabs who assist toppling Gaddafi, accusing them
of meddling and interfering in Libyan affairs. Yes, you read well:
Arabs are meddlers and interferers in Libya affairs, but the Nato's
nations are just there for humanitarian reasons!
On October 6, 2011, after Nato's ministers of defence meetting in Brussels,
Belgium, to evaluate the result of seven months's onslaught bombings
on Libya, the U.S.A.'s representative, Panetta, declared, "I
am convinced that we do not have to choose between fiscal security
and national security [...] But achieving that goal will test the very
future of leadership throughout Nato."
He, Panetta, is just making a faint allusion to the financial situation now
prevailing in this october 2011 in Europe and America. Which is very bad to
say the least. Let us listen to Dr. Shapiro, an IMF expert/ advisor to the
political big guns of the world, spelling it out more specifically, and clearly
in plain English:
People like Dr. Shapiro does not speak out like that in a "normal" world,
that is when the financial power was clearly in the western elites's
hands - during the past 300 years. If he speaks now, it is because he
knows that the financial situation is really bad and cannot be hidden
anymore from the masses. He knows that the financial power is shifting
from the West to the East. (We do not have enough space in this delivery
to develop and dwell on the matter.)
However, the consequence of the global financial shift occurring right
now from the West to the East, is there for any sober observer to see
and sense: Nato's nations do not have anymore the financial power
to sustain a lenghty bombing campaign for humanitarian reasons,
to supporting the NTC, wage war in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Irak. The
bombings will stop in the very near future of three months - the latest.
Not to forget that important elections are scheduled in France and Germany
during the first six months of 2012.
Would extending the bombings's period be enough to impose the NTC
on the Libyan population? That is the question. Based on the history
of Libya which sacrificed 1,000,000 out of 2,500,000 during the
1943-45 period to kick out the Italian invaders, Africabiz Online firmly
believes that it would not be enough. In the long term of one year time,
the NTC cannot win, and sending more Nato's boots on ground (they
are already there) would not help either.
-
Lessons From the Libyan Crisis
Gaddafi
himself made two big important political mistakes that shadowed the
economic success implemented under his leadership.
First of all his bravado
style of ruling does not help on the international political scenery.
His dressing habits and "histrionics" were easy targets for people
around the world to labeling him "the madman;" even if his political
intelligence and the economics he applied to the country show the contrary.
One thing is sure,
he Gaddafi, outplayed Nato's strategists. Nato
PLAN A was to install chaos.
They got more than expected. Now chaos is everywhere in Libya, but not the kind
of chaos expected by Nato. There are for instance, on the streets of Tripoli,
so many gunmen, that Nato war planes cannot distinguish between rebels and Qaddafi's
supporters.
And the second political mistake, he Gaddafi has made, was not to let out a breathing
political safety valve to the Libyan people to satisfy the minority.
That said, the first outlined
mistake was the most damaging. Does he have a choice for the second?
That is the question. No doubt about that, he has an intrinsic
and vivid sensual knowledge of his country. He knows that the
country sociological fabrics is based on tribal and clannish practices,
and developed his political strategy to rule accordingly.
The rebels are now confronted with the same problem. Times will tell
if they can force Libya's tribes and clans into the concept and mold
of western country democracy style. That would be an interesting experience
to watch.
That is for Gaddafi. Now for the other African nations. Our nations are
fragile, under construction. And our rulers naive people, for all the
respect due to head of states. They do not apprehend well the implacable
and "ferocious" world they are living in. They do not know
that everything is war. Mostly economic war for the most fitted. And
that the enemy is not far away waiting for the slightest opportunity
to charge on, to seize assets and natural resources, assisted by internal
enemies ready to open the gates of the city to the invaders.
Having modern telecommunication infrastructure is not enough. These infrastructure
must and should be secured to avoid jamming and flooding by adverse
propaganda. Securing them should be part of a thoroughly devised and
implemented National Security Strategy.
Investing huge amount of national money
abroad, without setting legal guarantee against mismanagement, bamboozling
and embezzlement of funds, is also a huge mistake. These
assets
are swindled, in a sleight of hands, under cooked United Nations's resolutions,
and disappear God only knows where, as soon as the opportunity arises.
At least now our rulers know.
As an African popular saying goes, “He who knows his
people’s
history, knows where he comes from and is mentally and spiritually equipped
to understand present-day problems, to prepare for a better future.”
For
that reason, Walter Rodney book, How
Europe Underdeveloped Africa,
is a must-read book for African policymakers. A breviary that would assist
African delegates attending international economic forums, political
arenas such as the United Nations assemblies and others, or negotiating
with developed countries’ partners.
It would make them aware of
past (political and economic) traps and sharp practices used on their
ancestors. They will further understand and apprehend the present challenge
faced by African countries with regard to the deceptive superstructure
of domination that is unbridled globalization, in order to defend Black
people’s
rights and interests for the best as the race is “under
perpetual siege and fighting an almost invisible war for survival […]” – to
quote Chancellor
James Williams.
To follow live the evolution of the Resistance
fight in Libya,
click here
About the author:Dr.
Bienvenu-Magloire Quenum is the principal/
managing director of Dr. Quenum & Associates, IBC. He is an experienced Investment & Business
Planner with 25 years consulting practice in African countries. He is the
editor in chief of Africabiz Online
"CONTRIBUTOR'S
GUIDELINES" are
available here.
We invite you to contribute to AFRICABIZ ONLINE MONTHLY ISSUE -
with articles related to "How Africa Could Bridge The Developing
Gap".
Your
feedback / objection / contribution is welcome. Visit WorldWide
BizCenter,
and choose General
Information (as topic) to
create a thread for discussion. On the top of the WorldWide BizCenter page,
there is a HELP link to assist you making an efficient
use of the discussion board. This
link also is useful
Many
thanks for subscribing to Africabiz. See you here on January 15, 2012
Delivery exposed
at this link describes the economics of a small scale unity to producing
liquid glucose from cassava starch.
Liquid glucose can be used as raw material in several opportunities above listed,
particularly in the ones concerning fruits [34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46]
and cereals [30, 31, 32, 33]
transformations.
As
you may know, surfing the Net, strange things may happen such as Malware and
other insidious piece of codes, and tracking cookies penetrating your system
through unguarded ports of your browser. And suddenly, you would be noticing
that your Homepage had changed, and the browser slowing down or behaving strangely.
Yes, when one visits some webpages, these quietly inject malicious code into
your system, to divert your chosen homepage towards another one, and even towards
a fake one of the original one. Worse, the injected pieces of codes would be
lying down silently until you connect to your banking account or enter purchasing
process to pay online. Then your credit card credentials and your banks account
login criteria will be stealthily grabbed.
AN
EFFICIENT AND FREE ALTERNATIVE TO MICROSOFT OFFICE SUITE
Microsoft
flagship software, Office Productivity Suite is a must have. Can you live without
Word, Exell, PowerPoint and Outlook mail clients? Certainly not.
However, it is not free. Further, an update can disrupt the suite and all the
components may start behaving weirdly. Outlook will not load and claim for install,
again and again. In short, Office Productivity Suite is a must have, but sometimes
it can become a pain in the ass.
The competition is running after Office since a decade without gaining substantial
ground. Some propose web based suite to try to beat Microsoft - which retaliated
proposing the same. Other desktop productivity suites are simply not fully compatible
with Microsoft Office's set standards. For instance, one can use such suites
to save a document into Microsoft office formats, to found out that your correspondent
- the destinator of the document, cannot open it.